Cook v. Standard Life & Accident Insurance
Michigan Supreme Court
■ Error to Muskegon. (Dickerman, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
On May 7, 1888, the defendant, a Michigan corporation, issued to the husband of plaintiff a policy *14of insurance for $5,000 upon a premium being paid of $25. A written application was filled out by the defendant’s agent at Muskegon, and was signed-by Bigelow T. Cook, the husband of plaintiff, the plaintiff being named as the beneficiary in the policy. The application contained the following clause:
“16. My habits of life are correct and temperate, and I understand and agree that the policy to be issued on this application will not cover any accidental injury which may happen to me either while…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Insurance Co. v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Cleaver v. Traders' InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
- The People v. . EastwoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1856
- Peoria Marine & Fire Insurance v. HallMichigan Supreme Court · 1864
- Miller v. Phœnix InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1869
3Cited by21 opinions
- Thornton v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. HaleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
- Supreme Council of Royal Arcanum v. BrashearsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1899
- Sullivan v. Mercantile Town Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Traiser v. Commercial Travellers' Eastern Accident Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.