Cunningham v. Cunningham
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.
“A clear duty of the guardian, defined by statute, is to loan the moneys of the ward, and, in making loans, to require bond and mortgage, or good personal security. * * * When, on the credit of the borrower alone, whether an individual, or a partnership, or a corporation,” he hazards the money of the ward, he departs from the line of his authority and duty, and becomes an insurer against loss to the ward. Whatever be the credit or solvency of the borrower, the guardian is absolutely liable for a loan without security — “liable, because the loan is a breach of trust, a violation of duty.”…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lee v. LeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
- Lee v. LeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
- McGowan v. MilnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. FreudCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1911
- Leach v. GraySupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Walsh v. WalshSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
- Hall v. EsslingerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
- Ward v. JossenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Dumas v. HollinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
- Black v. MorganSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.