Legal Opinion
United States v. $186,416.00 in U.S. Currency
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 17, 2013No. 07-56549PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Intervenor Paul Gabbert represented United Medical Caregivers Clinic (“UMCC”) in a civil forfeiture proceeding initiated by the United States, in which UMCC prevailed. See United States v. $186,416.00 in U.S. Currency, 590 F.3d 942 (9th Cir.2009). The Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act (“CAFRA”) provides that in “any civil proceeding to forfeit property under any provision of Federal law in which the claimant substantially prevails, the United States shall be liable for reasonable attorney fees and other litigation costs reasonably incurred by the claimant.” 28 U.S.C. § 2465(b)(1)(A).
UMCC…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Astrue v. RatliffSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Venegas v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Orff v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Orff v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. $186,416.00 in U.S. CurrencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. KimCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Seaview Trading, LLC v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Christopher KimCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Taylor v. ColvinDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2024