Legal Opinion
Bank of Yorktown v. Boland
New York Court of Appeals
Decided April 11, 1939PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Orders reversed, without costs, on authority of Dun & Bradstreet, Inc., v. City of New York (276 N. Y. 198), and the action remitted to the Special Term for further proceedings in accordance with the opinion in Matter of Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. New York State Labor Relations Board (280 N. Y. 194). First question certified answered in the affirmative. Other questions certified not answered. No opinion.
Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, Loughran and Finch, JJ. O’Brien, Hubbs and Rippey, JJ., concur for reversal but dissent as to further proceedings in the action.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. New York State Labor Relations BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
3Cited by17 opinions
- Morgenthau v. ErlbaumNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Saint Luke's Hospital v. Labor Relations CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- New York Foreign Trade Zone Operators, Inc. v. State Liquor AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
- New York Post Corp. v. KelleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. BolandNew York Supreme Court · 1941
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.