Legal Opinion
Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Boland
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 28, 1941PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtValente, J.
This is a motion by the plaintiff, the Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company, for a temporary injunction restraining the New York State Labor Relations Board from holding certain elections among the plaintiff’s employees in order to determine the proper representatives of the employees for the purposes of collective bargaining.
The original complaint sought a declaratory judgment to the effect that the decision of the Labor Board, dated December 21, 1940, which directed the holding of the election sought to be enjoined, was beyond the jurisdiction of the Board and improper for other reasons.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- National Labor Relations Board v. Falk Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Matter of Wallach's, Inc. v. BolandNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Bank of Yorktown v. BolandNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Schwartz v. HeffernanNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. BolandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
- Elkort v. 490 West End Avenue Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
- Cody v. KelleyNew York Supreme Court · 1945
- Bronx Paper Products Co. v. Di FedeNew York Supreme Court · 1957
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.