Legal Opinion

Ryan v. Dougherty

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1869PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the County Court of the City and County of San Francisco.

1Opinion of the CourtRhodes, J.

There are several provisions in the Statute of 1866, which are new to the law of forcible entry and detainer. A more enlarged definition is given, both to a forcible entry and a forcible detainer. The first section of the Act (see Stats. 1865-6, p. 768) provides that “if any person shall, with violence and a strong hand, enter into or upon any lands or buildings, either by breaking open doors, windows, or other parts of a house, or by any kind of violence or circumstance of terror, * * * such person shall be deemed guilty of a forcible entry, ” etc. An entry made ‘ ‘by breaking open doors,…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wilkinson v. SinghCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  2. Allen v. McMillionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  3. Sprinkle v. AndersonMontana Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Edwards v. BodkinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  5. Wilkinson v. SinghCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API