Legal Opinion

Murray v. Fitzgerald Convenient Centers, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 2, 1999No. A99A1557PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ellington, Judge.

Debra Murray sued Fitzgerald Convenient Centers, Inc. (“the store”) for injuries sustained when she fell on the store’s premises. The trial court granted the store’s motion for summary judgment, and Murray appealed. Because we conclude that material questions of fact remain regarding the store’s negligence and regarding Murray’s exercise of care for her own safety, we reverse.

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c). A de novo standard of review applies to an appeal…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Matjoulis v. Integon General Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  2. Robinson v. Kroger Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1997
  3. Alterman Foods, Inc. v. LigonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  4. Straughter v. J. H. Harvey Company, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  5. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority v. FifeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Swan Kang, Inc. v. Tae Sang Kang (Yi)Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  2. Kennestone Hospital, Inc. v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  3. Barton v. City of RomeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  4. Landrum v. Enmark Stations, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  5. Bousset v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API