Legal Opinion

Barton v. City of Rome

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 9, 2005No. A04A2349PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MlKELL, Judge.

Paul David Barton and his wife, Melanie Barton, appeal the summary judgment granted to the City of Rome (“the City”) in this slip and fall action. We reverse for the reasons set forth below.

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c). A de novo standard of review applies to an appeal from a grant of summary judgment, and we view the evidence, and all reasonable conclusions and inferences drawn from it, in the light most favorable to the nonmovant.

So viewed, the record…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Matjoulis v. Integon General Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  2. Robinson v. Kroger Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1997
  3. Christensen v. Overseas Partners Capital, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  4. Jackson v. Waffle House, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  5. Freyer v. SilverCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Perkins v. Val D'Aosta Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  2. Kennestone Hospital, Inc. v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  3. Cocklin v. JC Penney Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  4. Lore v. Suwanee Creek Homeowners Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  5. La Quinta Inns, Inc. v. LeechCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API