Legal Opinion
Dutrow v. New York State Racing & Wagering Board
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 5, 2005PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Crew III, J.P.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found that petitioner had administered mepivacaine to a horse within seven days of a race.
On April 27, 2003, Farmer Jake, a thoroughbred trained by petitioner, finished third in the sixth race at Aqueduct Racetrack in Queens County. Following the race, a routine blood and urine sample taken from Farmer Jake revealed the presence of 3-hydroxymepivacaine, a metabolite of the anesthetic mepivacaine, a substance not…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Kinlock v. New York State & Local Employees' Retirement SystemAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Zito v. New York State Racing & Wagering BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
3Cited by7 opinions
- Pletcher v. New York State Racing & Wagering BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Czermann v. New York State Racing & Wagering BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Dutrow v. New York State Racing & Wagering BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Dutrow v. New York State Racing & Wagering BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Matter of Pena v. New York State Gaming CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.