Legal Opinion

Javier Vanegas v. City of Pasadena

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 31, 2022No. 21-55478PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JAVIER VANEGAS, No. 21-55478 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:20-cv-07845- SVW-AGR CITY OF PASADENA; CITY OF PASADENA POLICE DEPARTMENT; KLOTZ, Individually; in his/her OPINION capacity as Police Officer for Pasadena Police Department; ARELLANES, Individually; in his/her capacity as Police Officer for Pasadena Police Department; STARK, Individually; in his/her capacity as Police Officer for Pasadena Police Department; RIEHL, Individually; in his/her capacity as Police Officer for Pasadena Police Department; MURREN,…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Board of the County Commissioners of Bryan County v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Kirstin Johnson v. Kierstie BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
  2. Randon Miller v. City of ScottsdaleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
  3. (PS) Creel v. Sacramento County Sheriff DepartmentDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
  4. (PS) Vitaly v. Arcade Creek Recreation Park DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
  5. Abdul-Hafeez v. City of San DiegoDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2025

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API