Legal Opinion

State v. Farmer

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1997No. 23701PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WORKMAN, Chief Justice:

The defendant below and Appellant herein, Samuel Farmer (hereinafter Appellant), appeals four convictions of delivery of a controlled substance. 1 On appeal, Appellant asserts that these four convictions were based entirely on testimony given by Elvin Adol-phus Wilkins, one of the State’s -witnesses, and that the trial court violated Rule 614(b) of the West Virginia Rules of Evidence by improperly prompting Mr. Wilkins’ testimony. Appellant, therefore, argues this Court should reverse the four convictions and award him a new trial on those charges. 2 For the following…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. McGinnisWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. McDougal v. McCammonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Gentry v. MangumWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. BurtonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Shamblin v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. SalmonsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Herbert J. Thomas Memorial Hospital Assoc. v. Susan NutterWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2016
  3. State v. ThompsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Alexander Ex Rel. Ramsey v. WillardWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State v. WaughWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2007

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API