Legal Opinion

Nancy Kriel v. Richard Kriel

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 27, 2014No. 49A04-1304-DR-195Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of Jan 27 2014, 6:58 am establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the law of the case. ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE: CASEY D. CLOYD MERLE B. ROSE Indianapolis, Indiana Indianapolis, Indiana IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA NANCY KRIEL, ) ) Appellant-Petitioner, ) ) vs. ) No. 49A04-1304-DR-195 ) RICHARD KRIEL, ) ) Appellee-Respondent. ) APPEAL FROM THE MARION SUPERIOR COURT The Honorable David J. Dreyer,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Voigt v. VoigtIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Augspurger v. HudsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Cannon v. CannonIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  4. In re the Marriage of DillmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Brenda Alexander v. Donald AlexanderIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API