Legal Opinion

State v. Thurmond

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1873PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from Panola. Tried below before the Hon. M. W. Wheeler. The facts of the case are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtOgden, J.

A judgment nisi was entered in this case against a defaulting witness for a contempt of court in disobeying a subpoena; 'scire facias issued, and at the next term the witness came in and filed an answer, showing cause why the judgment nisi should not be made final, and praying that the same be set aside, and he be dismissed with his costs.

This was a proceeding against the party for a contempt, and that court whose authority and mandate had been contemned was, and is, under the statute, the sole judge of the extent and culpability of that contempt. If the party has in his answer fully purged…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Crow v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1859

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Ex parte DegenerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1891
  2. Collins v. KegansCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  3. Taylor v. GoodrichCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1897
  4. Tims v. TimsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
  5. Hudgens v. YanceyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API