Legal Opinion

Martin v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 21, 1990Published

1Opinion of the Court

DOYLE, Judge.

This is an appeal by James B. Martin (Petitioner) from an order of the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole (Board) denying Petitioner administrative relief from a parole revocation decision. That decision recommitted Petitioner as a technical parole violator to serve twelve months backtime for violating a special condition of parole prohibiting his consumption of alcohol and as a convicted parole violator to serve six months backtime for the conviction of *430driving under the influence. Thus, Petitioner’s total recommitment time was eighteen months.

The facts in this case are…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rivenbark v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Threats v. BD. OF PROBATION & PAROLESupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Morrow v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Smith v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Amaker v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API