Legal Opinion
Overpeck v. Chicago Pneumatic Tool Company
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided July 10, 1987No. 86-1232Published
1Opinion of the Court
823 F.2d 751
Prod.Liab.Rep.(CCH)P 11,482
OVERPECK, Howard N. and Overpeck, Christine, his wife, Appellants
v.
CHICAGO PNEUMATIC TOOL COMPANY, and Coats Company, Inc., a
Division of Hennessy Industries, Inc.
No. 86-1232.
United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.
Argued Dec. 16, 1986.
Decided July 10, 1987.
Ronald W. Shipman (argued), Shipman & Grifo, and James C. Hogan, Easton, Pa., for appellants.
Maria Zulick, Charles W. Craven (argued), John P. Penders, Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellees.
Before HIGGINBOTHAM and BECKER, Circuit Judges, and DUMBAULD,*…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Webb v. ZernSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Incollingo v. EwingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Incollingo v. EWINGSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Technical Chemical Company v. JacobsTexas Supreme Court · 1972
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.