Legal Opinion

United States v. Terry

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided June 12, 1996No. 95-5473, 95-5474, 95-5478PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MICHAEL, Circuit Judge:

Because they shot at an occupied vehicle (a crime under Virginia law) while in a national forest, Lewis Charles Terry and Carlos Lee Bishop were convicted for violating the Assimilative Crimes Act, 18 U.S.C. § 13(a) (the “ACA”), and for using a firearm in connection with a crime of violence, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c). At sentencing the district court dismissed the § 924(c) count as to both defendants on double jeopardy grounds. The government appeals the dismissal of the gun count, and the defendants cross-appeal their sentences on the ACA count. Both…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Whalen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Albernaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Rutledge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Estate of Cowart v. Nicklos Drilling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. United States v. NicholsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  2. United States v. AyalaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
  3. United States v. FieldsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  4. United States v. ChandiaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
  5. United States v. FortierCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API