Legal Opinion

Ross v. Holman

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 12, 1916No. 20,117PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Ellis district court; Jacob C. Ruppenthal, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Marshall, J.:

This is an action on a promissory note. The defense is that the note was given for debts incurred in certain transactions prohibited by law. The plaintiffs recovered judgment. The defendant appeals.

1. One of the questions necessary to determine in order to reach a correct conclusion on the principal proposition is, Did the answer put in issue the legality of the consideration for the note? The answer contains a general denial and alleges:

“Defendant admits that he executed the note sued on herein, but says there was no legal consideration…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hutchins v. StanleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  2. Carey v. MyersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  3. Orthwein-Matchette Investment Co. v. McFarlinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  4. Stafford County Grain Co. v. Rock Milling & Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1915

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gregory v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  2. Yuncker v. EnglishSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API