Noren Et Ux. v. Wood
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Action to recover damages for fraud in the exchange of real estate, brought to the Court of Common Pleas in Fair-field County and tried to the court, Carroll, J.; facts found and judgment rendered for the defendant, and appeal by the plaintiffs for alleged errors in the rulings and findings of the court. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, C. J.
The plaintiffs in their complaint alleged that they had been defrauded by the defendant in the purchase from him of a certain piece of land, and set forth the facts which they claimed showed the fraud. The action was made returnable to the Court of Common Pleas in Fairfield county on the first Tuesday of May, 1898. An answer was filed on the 14th day of October, then next, to one part of which the plaintiffs demurred. Thereafter, on the 24th day of February, 1899, by mutual consent all the pleadings were withdrawn; and by consent of court a substituted complaint was filed. To this substituted…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Home Oil Co. v. ToddSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Krupa v. Farmington River Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- Leahey v. HeasleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- McKay v. Fair Haven & Westville RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1903
- State v. PerrellaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.