Legal Opinion
Werbungs Und Commerz Union Austalt v. Collectors' Guild, Ltd.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided April 18, 1991No. 1365, Docket 90-7110PublishedCited by 66 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALTIMARI, Circuit Judge:
The dispute in the underlying action centers upon the allocation of profits earned by defendant-appellant Collectors’ Guild, Ltd. (“Collectors’ Guild”) from the sale of lithographic reproductions of illustrations created by famed artist Salvador Dali. Pursuant to a contract with Collectors’ Guild’s assignor, Maecenas Press, Ltd. (“Maecenas”), plaintiff-appellee Werbungs Und Commerz Union Austalt (“Werbungs”) claimed a right to one-half of these profits. After Collectors’ Guild refused to recognize this claim, Werbungs commenced an action against Collectors’ Guild in…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Chimart Associates v. PaulNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Thomas E. Hoar, Inc. v. Sara Lee Corp., Appeal of Greenspan, Jaffe & Rosenblatt, Leon J. Greenspan, Paul D. Jaffe and Victor E. RosenblattCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Van Wagner Advertising Corp. v. S & M EnterprisesNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Shu-Tao Lin v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- Hygh v. JacobsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Kerman v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Min Jin v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Kathleen Madaline Jarvis, Individually and as a Parent and Guardian of Paul Michael Attila Jarvis, a Minor v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Smith v. K-Mart CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.