Legal Opinion
IceMOS Technology Corporation v. Omron Corporation
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided September 30, 2019No. 2:17-cv-02575Unknown
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 IceMOS Technology Corporation, No. CV-17-02575-PHX-JAT 10 Plaintiff/Counter-defendant, ORDER 11 v. 12 Omron Corporation, 13 Defendant/Counterclaimant. 14 15 Pending before the Court are IceMOS Technology Corporation’s (“Plaintiff”) 16 Daubert motions to exclude Allan Morrison (Doc. 227), Charles Malek (Doc. 238), Randy 17 Cavaiani (Doc. 241), Robert Vincent (Doc. 244), and Kenneth Malek (Doc. 247) as experts 18 (collectively, “Plaintiff’s Daubert Motions”).1 The Court now rules on the motions.2 19 I.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Helling v. McKinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Joan Hangarter v. Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company, and the Paul Revere Life Insurance Company Unumprovident Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.