Legal Opinion

Austin v. Caterpillar, Inc.

District Court, C.D. Illinois

Decided December 20, 2021No. 1:21-cv-01113Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS PEORIA DIVISION BRADLEY AUSTIN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 1:21-cv-1113 ) CATERPILLAR INC., et al, ) ) Defendants. ) OPINION AND ORDER Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand (ECF No. 16); Defendant Black and Decker’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 7); and Defendant Caterpillar Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 9). For the reasons stated below, Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand is DENIED and Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss (7) and (9) are both GRANTED. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Bradley Austin is a former employee of…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. Grupo Dataflux v. Atlas Global Group, L. P.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Lincoln Property Co. v. RocheSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API