Legal Opinion · Dissent

Tasker v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided November 10, 2010No. SC09-1281Published

1DissentPolston, J.

I agree with the First District Court of Appeal that section 924.06(2), Florida Statutes, procedurally bars Tasker from challenging victim injury points that were included on his original scoresheet in 2005. See Tasker v. State, 12 So.3d 889 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009). Section 924.06(2) limits those issues that may be considered on appeal from an order revoking probation to only those “proceedings after the order of probation.” Therefore, Tasker cannot now challenge the victim injury points, which were assessed prior to his order of probation.

Tasker’s victim injury points appeared on his original…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. WhitfieldSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  2. Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2010
  3. Forehand v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
  4. State v. MontagueSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
  5. Dailey v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API