Legal Opinion

Dailey v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 22, 1986No. 67381PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

488 So.2d 532 (1986)

Roosevelt DAILEY, Petitioner,

v.

STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 67381.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 22, 1986.

Michael E. Allen, Public Defender and P. Douglas Brinkmeyer, Asst. Public Defender, Second Judicial Circuit, Tallahassee, for petitioner.

Jim Smith, Attorney General and John W. Tiedemann, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for respondent.

McDONALD, Justice.

We accepted jurisdiction to answer the following question of great public interest:

DOES THE CONTEMPORANEOUS OBJECTION RULE APPLY TO PRECLUDE APPELLATE REVIEW OF AN ALLEGED SENTENCING ERROR UNDER THE GUIDELINES WHERE THE…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. RhodenSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
  2. State v. WhitfieldSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  3. Walker v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  4. Dailey v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  5. State v. SnowSupreme Court of Florida · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Maddox v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  2. Nelson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  3. Lomont v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  4. Forehand v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
  5. State v. MontagueSupreme Court of Florida · 1996

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API