Hosack v. Rogers
New York Court of Chancery
This case came before the chancellor upon exceptions by both parties, that is of the complainants and of Nehemiah Rogers, one of the defendants, to the report of the master made in this cause under the decretal order of the 22d of April, 1840. The facts upon which the questions of law arose are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
The Chancellor.
The first exception on the part of the complainant relates to the allowance of different items of counsel fees paid by N. Rogers to his counsel, for various services in this cause, amounting in the whole to $3350. Most of these charges would be properly allowed to the executor upon a final decree directing him to be allowed his costs as between solicitor and client. But as the ques*463tion whether the executor is or is not to have his costs in this cause, and whether he is to have the mere taxable costs, as between party and party, or his necessary disbursements as between…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Livermore v. . BainbridgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- In re O'BrienNew York Surrogate's Court · 1893
- In re Estate of DenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Fisher v. FisherNew York Surrogate's Court · 1850
- Field v. FieldNew York Surrogate's Court · 1876
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.