Legal Opinion

Fisher v. Fisher

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided November 15, 1850PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TW. Subrogate.

The testator, by his will, set apart the rents of certain leasehold estate in William and Pearl Streets, in the city of Mew-York, for the purpose of forming a fund, out of which his executors should pay specified legacies and annuities ; and within one year after all the legacies should be paid or compromised, he directed his executors to sell all his remaining property, and divide the avails among his eight children, or their representatives. Until the time arrived for the sale and distribution, it was the duty of the executors to collect the rents of this leasehold property…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Williams v. Dakin & BaconCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1839
  2. Bank of Troy v. ToppingNew York Supreme Court · 1832
  3. Vanderheyden v. VanderheydenNew York Court of Chancery · 1830
  4. In re Bank of NiagaraNew York Court of Chancery · 1836
  5. Stiles v. BurchNew York Court of Chancery · 1835

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of SwartzNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937
  2. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of the Binghamton Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  3. Tucker v. McDermottNew York Surrogate's Court · 1876
  4. Michenfelder v. GuntherCity of New York Municipal Court · 1884
  5. Miller v. . KnoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1872

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API