Legal Opinion

State v. Duk Won Lee

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1996No. 17294PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEVINSON, Justice.

The defendant-appellant Duk Won Lee was convicted of attempted murder in the second degree, in violation of Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) §§ 707-701.5(1) (1993) 1 and 705-500 (1993), 2 following a jury trial. At trial, two of the prosecution’s critical witnesses did not testify. Rather, transcripts of their testimony, given at the preliminary hearing, were read to the jury at trial, following a ruling by the trial court that the transcripts were admissible as evidence, pursuant to Hawaii Rules of Evidence (HRE) Rules 804(a)(5) and 804(b)(1), because the witnesses were…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Barber v. PageSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. State v. ArceoHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. JenkinsHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. RoganHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State v. KotisHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. QuitogHawaii Supreme Court · 1997

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API