Hersom v. Hersom
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Fred H. Taft, Judge. Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.
This is an action for divorce. The appeal is taken by defendant from an interlocutory decree rendered in favor of plaintiff, and the only points made by appellant relate to the disposition of certain alleged community property of the parties. In addition to various denials contained in her answer, appellant averred affirmatively that respondent and his mother had fraudulently deprived appellant of her interest in the alleged community property. It was averred that the fraud was consummated 'by respondent’s mother purchasing certain mortgages which were outstanding against the property,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. TaminagoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
- People v. WaltonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Cross v. ThieleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kustoff v. ChaplinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941
- Rochester Capital Leasing Corp. v. K & L Litho Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1970
- Gibson v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955
- Madera Sugar Pine Co. v. AdamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Hersom v. HersomCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.