Legal Opinion

Blaser v. Cameron

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided June 26, 1989No. 17202PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWANSTROM, Judge.

This case presents an issue of law with respect to a rule of procedure. We are asked to decide whether a seller’s claim for money due on a real estate contract should be barred for failure to plead it as a compulsory counterclaim in the buyers’ earlier action for specific performance. We hold— contrary to the decision of the district court — that appellant’s claim for money due on a real estate contract is not barred for failure to plead it in the earlier action. Accordingly, for reasons which follow, we vacate the judgment. We remand for a decision on the merits.

*455The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bennett v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of MarylandNevada Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Joseph v. DarrarIdaho Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Chapin & Chapin, Inc. v. McShane Contracting Co., Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1974

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. F. Kim Bailey v. Kerry BaileyIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Zenner v. HolcombIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Allen v. MartinColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. In Re Estate of KrotiukColorado Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. Blaser v. CameronIdaho Court of Appeals · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API