Zenner v. Holcomb
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BURDICK, Justice.
This appeal arises out of the district court’s award of actual attorney fees and costs to Respondents Bradley and Allason Zenner (the Zenners) pursuant to Paragraph 20 of the construction contract entered into between the Appellants Lance and Jennifer Holcomb (the Holcombs) and the Zenners. The Holcombs appeal from the award, arguing the Zenners are not the prevailing party and, therefore, are not entitled to costs and attorney fees under the contract. Alternatively, the Holcombs argue that even if the Zenners are the prevailing party, the district court should have…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Sun Valley Shopping Center, Inc. v. Idaho Power Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
- Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. AugustSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Polk v. LarrabeeIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
- Ireland v. IrelandIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
- Steiner Corp. v. American District TelegraphIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- F. Kim Bailey v. Kerry BaileyIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
- Zeyen v. Pocatello/Chubbuck School Dist 25Idaho Supreme Court · 2019
- Alsco v. Fatty's BarIdaho Supreme Court · 2020
- Crump v. BromleyIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
- Losee v. Idaho Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 2009
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.