Stockton v. Hind
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.
This is an appeal by the plaintiffs from a judgment following an order sustaining the defendants’ demurrer to the second amended complaint without leave to amend in an action for the rescission of a contract on the ground of fraud.
Stripped of its legal verbiage, and as stated by the plaintiffs in their opening brief, the averments of the second amended complaint may be summarized as follows: The plaintiffs are husband and wife. The defendants are the Hind Ranch Company, the California Pacific Title Insurance Company, the Hind Company, Inc., a corporation, Alice R. Hind, George U. Hind, and C.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Spreckels v. GorrillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Phelps v. GradyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Dow v. SwainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Crandall v. ParksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Henry v. Continental Bldg. Etc. Assoc.California Supreme Court · 1909
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- French v. FreemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Carpenter v. HamiltonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Harris v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Schonfeld v. City of VallejoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Neff v. EnglerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.