Legal Opinion
Franco v. East Shore Development, Inc.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided October 29, 2002No. AC 21958PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCHALLER, J.
The appellant, Laurel Woods, Inc. (Laurel Woods), appeals from the trial court’s decision denying its motion to join in the proceedings as a party. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts are necessary for our resolution of the appeal. On September 24, 1992, the plaintiff, Donald L. Franco, and the defendant, East Shore Development, Inc. (East Shore), entered into a contract (agreement). According to the terms of the agreement, Franco was to manage a nursing facility that East Shore was going to build, own and operate. East Shore completed the facility…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- City of Milford v. Local 1566Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Rosado v. Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Wesleyan University v. Rissil Construction Associates, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1983
- City of Hartford v. Local 308Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- McCaffrey v. United Aircraft CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Franco v. East Shore Development, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Selander v. Soundview Technology Corp., No. Cv02 0189753 (Feb. 10, 2003)Connecticut Superior Court · 2003