Legal Opinion

Carroll v. Hastings

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1977PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Edward O. Provenzano, J.

This is a proceeding, pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the respondent agents and employees of the City of Rochester denying petitioner’s application for an entertainment license.

Petitioner is doing business as The Centurion Lounge in premises at 1363 North Goodman Street in the City of Roches*391ter. It appears that petitioner’s business at that address is a restaurant and bar.

At some unspecified date prior to July 18, 1977 petitioner applied for a class D amusement license (issued by the City of Rochester) for the said…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. MATTER OF STATE OF NY v. KingNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Matter of Small v. MossNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  3. Matter of Small v. MossNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  4. Barton Trucking Corp. v. O'ConnellNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
  5. Fink v. ColeNew York Court of Appeals · 1956

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. 421 Corp. v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson CountyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
  2. Carroll v. HastingsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  3. Corp. v. Metro Gov't of NashvilleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API