Legal Opinion

Bodenhagen v. Farmers Mutual Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1959PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

The parties agree that the law of Illinois, where the alleged tort occurred, will determine whether the plaintiff has a cause of action against her husband. Unless she has a cause of action against him, she has none against his insurer.

In 1931 this court had before it an action by a wife against her husband for personal injury caused by a tort which occurred in Illinois prior to the marriage of the parties. Buckeye v. Buckeye (1931), 203 Wis. 248, 234 N. W. 342. This court decided that under the Illinois law the plaintiff’s cause of action became extinguished when she married the defendant.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brandt v. KellerIllinois Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Welch v. DavisIllinois Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Buckeye v. BuckeyeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Tallios v. TalliosAppellate Court of Illinois · 1952
  5. Garlin v. GarlinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wartell v. FormusaIllinois Supreme Court · 1966
  2. United States v. Leta MooreCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
  3. Robinson v. GainesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
  4. Pirc v. KortebeinDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1960
  5. Goldberg v. FaullDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API