State v. Moore
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Judge.
The defendant contends that the bill of indictment is defective for failure to charge that the defendant acted with intent to defraud. The record reveals that none of the defendant’s assignments of error are addressed to the sufficiency of the indictment. Furthermore, our examination of the record reveals that at no time did the defendant move to quash the indictment. Nevertheless, we treat his contention as a motion in arrest of judgment filed in this Court. State v. Doughtie, 238 N.C. 228, 77 S.E. 2d 642 (1953); State v. Hadlock, 34 N.C. App. 226, 237 S.E. 2d 748 (1977).
It…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. . DavenportSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
- State v. DavenportSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
- State v. SquireSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- State v. McAllisterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. DoughtieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. ArmsteadCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002