Legal Opinion
Wilko v. Swan
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 23, 1952PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GODDARD, District Judge.
Motion by' defendants, Hayden, Stone & Co. to stay the trial of this action pursuant to Title 9 U.S.C.A. § -3, and all further proceedings herein until an arbitration has been had in accordance with the terms of the margin agreements entered into between plaintiff and defendants. Defendants, Hayden, Stone & Co. have not yet answered the complaint. The Securities and Exchange Commission has filed a brief amicus curiae opposing the stay of proceedings pending arbitration.
The suit is under the Securities Act of May 27, 1933 as amended, 15 U.S.C.A. § 77a et seq., and seeks…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Kulukundis Shipping Co. v. Amtorg Trading Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Burchell v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
- Donahue v. Susquehanna Collieries Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1943
- American Almond Products Co. v. Consolidated Pecan Sales Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Watkins v. Hudson Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Wilko v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Wilko v. SwanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
- Pacific Dunlop Holdings Incorporated, a Delaware Corporation v. Allen & Company Incorporated, a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Shearson, Hammill & Co. v. VouisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
- Wilko v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.