Legal Opinion

People v. Weisman

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 26, 1996Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Rena K. Uviller, J.

This motion to dismiss an indictment underscores the pitfalls of New York’s excessively broad immunity law. It demonstrates how a Grand Jury witness who is engaged in illegal activity can be inadvertently insulated from prosecution by seemingly innocuous questions posed to him by a prosecutor who had no reason to suspect the witness’ criminality. In this case, New York’s statutory scheme serves to abort the prosecution of a lawyer who has allegedly stolen more than $350,000 from his client and then forged documents to conceal the theft.

Defendant Steven…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Counselman v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Heike v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Matter of DoyleNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  5. People v. BellNew York Court of Appeals · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API