Legal Opinion
Kugler v. Banner Pontiac-Buick, Opel, Inc.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided September 28, 1972PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
120 N.J. Super. 572 (1972)
295 A.2d 385
GEORGE F. KUGLER, JR., ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF,
v.
BANNER PONTIAC-BUICK, OPEL, INC. A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.
Decided September 28, 1972.
Ms. Joan Holleran Walsack, Deputy Attorney General for the Plaintiff.
Mr. Thomas P. Ford, Jr., for defendant (Messrs. Citrino, Carella, Balsam & Ford, attorneys).
STAMLER, J.S.C.
The question before the court is whether the Attorney General is precluded from bringing a consumer fraud action under N.J.S.A. 56:8-1 et seq. after defendant had been…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Helvering v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Coffey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Kugler v. RomainSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Shaner v. Horizon Bancorp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
- Jersey Central Power & Light Co. v. Melcar Utility Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
- Weinisch v. SawyerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
- In re the Registrant, C.A.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
- Moya v. City of New BrunswickSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.