Blomberg v. Montgomery
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant Thomas Montgomery from an order of the district court for Nicollet county, Webber, J., denying his motion for a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtCanty, J.
Plaintiff brought an action for the partition of the quarter section of land here in question, and in his complaint alleges that he is the owner of two-fifths of said land, that defendants are husband and *150wife, that defendant Sarah A. Montgomery is the owner of the other three-fifths of the land, and that defendant Thomas Montgomery claims in his own right some interest in the land, which claim is unfounded. Defendant Thomas answered, and alleged that he is the owner in fee simple of the whole of the land. On the trial before the court without a jury, the court found that plaintiff is the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ambs v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Rodes v. St. Anthony & Dakota Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Vose v. StickneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1872
3Cited by3 opinions
- Leland v. HeibergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- Hess v. StockardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Lanhardt v. SouderDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1914