Legal Opinion

Holcomb v. Meeds

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 3, 1952No. 38,692PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tbe opinion of the court was delivered by

Harvey, C. J.:

This was an action for damages for an alleged wrongful death. After the issues were made up the parties in writing stipulated the facts. A trial by jury was waived and a trial by the court was had, resulting in a judgment for plaintiff. Defendants have appealed.

The pertinent facts as stipulated may be summarized or quoted as follows: The deceased, Lionel Holcomb, his wife, the plaintiff herein, and their son David, about six months old, resided in Joplin, Mo., about fourteen miles east of Baxter Springs, Kan. The defendants, as partners,…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Newcomb v. Boston Protective DepartmentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  2. Dudley v. Northampton Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  3. Hall v. CorcoranMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  4. Johnson v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1928
  5. McGrath v. MerwinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Price v. SinnottNevada Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Kimple v. FosterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970
  3. Chomatopoulos v. Roma DeNotte Social ClubNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
  4. Langford v. VandaveerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1953
  5. Cramer v. TarrDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1958

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API