Legal Opinion

State v. Lieurance

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided November 22, 1989No. 63,290PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Abbott, C.J.:

This is a direct appeal by the defendant, Vernon L. Lieurance, from his conviction for driving under the influence, contrary to K.S.A. 1987 Supp. 8-1567(a)(l). Defendant’s breath test result was .234.

1. Verification by a Notary

Lieurance argues that the complaint, in this case, was not sufficient because it was not sworn to before a judge. The trial court held that State v. Fraker, 12 Kan. App. 2d 259, 739 P.2d 940 (1987), modified 242 Kan. 466, 748 P.2d 868 (1988), does not require the complaint to be sworn to before a judge and that a notary is sufficient.

The language of the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. United States v. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. State v. NunnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1989
  4. United States v. Everette A. BohrerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
  5. State v. DeutscherSupreme Court of Kansas · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Wiles v. American Family Life Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  2. City of Overland Park v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  3. State v. BishopSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  4. State v. MuckSupreme Court of Kansas · 1997
  5. Meehan v. Kansas Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1998

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API