Legal Opinion

State v. Bishop

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 17, 1998No. 79,579PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Abbott, J.:

This is a direct appeal by the defendant, Gary A. Bishop, from his convictions for driving under the influence of alcohol (K.S.A. 1997 Supp. 8-1567) and failure to maintain a single lane of traffic (K.S.A. 8-1522).

Bishop is a deaf mute who communicates through American Sign Language. At 11:36 p.m. on August 9, 1996, Trooper Steven Zeller observed Bishop’s car weave drastically within its lane of traffic and leave its lane of traffic at least once. Bishop was accompanied by two children.

After stopping Bishop, the trooper realized that Bishop…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Pennsylvania v. MunizSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. State v. AldersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996
  4. State v. HaddockSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995
  5. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. RaschkeSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  2. State v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  3. State v. ErnestiSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
  4. Commonwealth v. RobinsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Meehan v. Kansas Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1998

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API