Legal Opinion

Lafferty v. Moll

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 27, 1931No. Appeal, 217PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Kephaet,

Moll, appellee, by agreement was designated an agent of Lafferty, appellant, to collect the rents from and make sale of several properties, and account to appellant. This bill was for an accounting. The court below found that the collection and payment of rents on appellant’s account were clearly shown by defendant, and a statement of such transactions was given showing receipts and expenditures. We have read the record and agree with this conclusion.

The court also found that the sales of the various properties complained of were made pursuant to an agreement in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rich v. Black & BairdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  2. Jones v. AronsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  3. Powers v. BlackSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wood AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API