Legal Opinion

Bowie v. Maddox

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided January 7, 2010No. Civil Action No. 2003-0948Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) DAVID M. BOWIE, Pro Se ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 03-948 (RCL) ) CHARLES C. MADDOX et al. ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________) MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff David M. Bowie moves under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60 for relief from this Court’s order of March 31, 2008 denying plaintiff’s motion for judgment as a matter of law and motion for a new trial. Plaintiff also moves for post-judgment discovery. Upon consideration of the motions [150, 159], the oppositions…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. McNeil v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Mohasco Corp. v. SilverSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Richardson, Roy Dale v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API