Legal Opinion
United States Ex Rel. Williams v. Deegan
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 17, 1967No. 67-Civ. 2701PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CROAKE, District Judge.
MEMORANDUM
This is a pro se application for a writ of habeas corpus. 1 Robert V. Williams, the relator, alleges that refusal of the trial court to grant a request for withdrawal of his previously entered guilty plea deprived him of his right to a speedy trial as guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment. He further suggests that the denial of his application to appeal to the New York State Court of Appeals and the conduct and remarks of the prosecutor during trial amounted to a deprivation of due process within the meaning of the 14th Amendment. Finally, relator claims that as a…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States ex rel. Brown v. LaValleeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969
- United States v. HaulmanDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1968
- Moore v. BetoDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1970
- Charles E. Hart v. Frank Eyman, Warden, Arizona State Prison, State of ArizonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- Charles E. Hart v. Frank Eyman, Warden, Arizona State Prison, State of ArizonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972