Legal Opinion

Jacobus v. Willis

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1911PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Action for an injunction.

1Opinion of the CourtGuy, J.

Plaintiffs ask an injunction restraining defendant from continuing an encroachment by defendant upon plaintiffs’ property, or, in the alternative, damages suffered by plaintiffs by reason thereof. The property in question, ■belonging to the plaintiffs, consists of an unimproved lot, 25 feet by 100 in size, known as Ko. 14 West Sixty-fourth street, Manhattan borough, in this city. A survey, offered in evidence by plaintiffs, shows that the building erected by defendant in 1895, on the adjoining lot in West Sixty-fourth street, encroaches upon plaintiffs’ land one and one-half to two and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. New York City v. PineSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Amerman v. . DeaneNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  3. Crocker v. Manhattan Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
  4. Knoth v. Manhattan Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1907
  5. Bates v. HolbrookAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. MullenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
  2. Christopher v. RosseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  3. McGraw v. SelkisNew York Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API