Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Douglas

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided September 5, 2002No. 01-0777/AFPublished

1DissentEffron, Judge

In the present case, trial counsel sought to introduce evidence of a prior conviction in support of the prosecution’s sentencing case. The military judge admitted the evidence, subject to the condition that the trial counsel *277redact information that the military judge determined to be inadmissible as either irrelevant or potentially confusing. The trial counsel neglected to redact the information before submitting it to the members of the court-martial. Contrary to the ruling of the military judge, the unredacted information was considered during the sentencing deliberation by the members. The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. ClevelandUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
  2. United States v. AriailCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1998
  3. United States v. VasquezCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2001
  4. United States v. NellumU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1987
  5. United States v. BroganU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API