Legal Opinion
State v. Cates
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided January 24, 2011No. 107, September Term, 2009PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAdkins, J.
Respondents Dean Cates, Randy Kucsan, Bill Tran, and Dana Way (the “Officers”) are police officers working for Montgomery County (the “County”). The County’s automated speed monitoring system captured the Officers exceeding the posted speed limits in police vehicles at various locations in the County. The initial citations were issued to the County, as the owner of the police vehicles. The County and the Montgomery County Police Department (the “Department”) determined that, although the Officers were on duty, they were not responding to emergencies, and the Department reissued the citations…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Anderson National Bank v. LuckettSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Robeson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Unger v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
- Savage v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
- Pizza di Joey v. Mayor & City Cncl. of Balt.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
- Vigna v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
- State v. Brookman State v. CarnesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.