Legal Opinion
Holt v. Gaston County Dyeing Mach. Co.
District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Decided February 16, 1928PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAYES, District Judge.
This is a suit in equity to enjoin the defendants from infringing upon certain patents of the plaintiff, which he alleges the defendants have infringed. It is admitted that the defendants are inhabitants of Gaston county, in the Western district of North Carolina, and that they do not maintain a place of business in the Middle district of North Carolina, and it is conceded that the Western district of North Carolina is the proper venue for this suit.
The defendants were served with process in the Western district, issuing from the Middle district, of North Carolina. The…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Brookings State Bank v. Federal Reserve BankDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1923
- Avent v. Deep River Lumber Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern North Carolina · 1909
- O'Brien v. LasharCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
3Cited by3 opinions
- Feldman Inv. Co. v. Connecticut General Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
- (PC) Coleman v. SosaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- (PC) Sosa v. CSATF WardenDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023