Legal Opinion
Long v. City of Anaheim
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 18, 1967No. Civ. 8310PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.
The plaintiffs are both members of the Socialist Labor Party and instituted this action in their individual capacities, and upon behalf of other members of the Party, for the purpose of enjoining the City of Anaheim and the City of Garden Grove from exacting the payment of a business license fee from members of the Party who distribute and sell the official newspaper of the Socialist Labor Party, known as the “Weekly People,” within the boundaries of the respective cities.
The plaintiffs have been members of the Party for many years. Since 1960 the plaintiff Helen Long has been the highest…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Schneider v. State (Town of Irvington)Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Near v. Minnesota Ex Rel. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Stromberg v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Lovell v. City of GriffinSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Wirta v. Alameda-Contra Costa Transit DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Stanley v. American Fire & Cas. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1978
- Weekes v. City of OaklandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Tip Top Foods, Inc. v. LyngCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Advance Transformer Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.