Legal Opinion

Hensley v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1986No. 86S00-8603-CR-241PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PIVARNIK, Justice.

Defendant-Appellant Raymond Hensley was found guilty by a jury in the Warren Circuit Court of the crime of theft and was also found to be an habitual offender. The trial court sentenced him to a term of two (2) years on the theft conviction, enhanced by thirty (80) years on the habitual offender finding, for a total term of thirty-two (82) years.

Appellant presents five issues for our consideration in this direct appeal:

1. improper sentencing in the habitual offender finding;

2. unreasonable sentence imposed;

sufficiency of the evidence; g

improper verdict forms; and p

ou…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Rummel v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Maldonado v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Golden v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Cheney v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Parsley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Canaan v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
  2. McCollum v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Seay v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Mills v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Smith v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1987

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API